Compare the two-kingdom, three-kingdom, and five-kingdom systems of classification.

Feature Two-Kingdom System Three-Kingdom System Five-Kingdom System
Proposed By Carolus Linnaeus (1735) Ernst Haeckel (1866) R.H. Whittaker (1969)
Number of Kingdoms 2 (Plantae & Animalia) 3 (Plantae, Animalia & Protista) 5 (Monera, Protista, Fungi, Plantae, Animalia)
Cell Type No distinction between prokaryotes and eukaryotes Introduced Protista for unicellular organisms Clear distinction between prokaryotes (Monera) and eukaryotes
Presence of Nucleus No distinction Some organisms have a nucleus (Protista) Monera lacks a nucleus, others have a nucleus
Fungi Classification Grouped with plants Still grouped with plants Placed in a separate kingdom due to unique characteristics (heterotrophic, chitin cell wall)
Protists Classification Not recognized separately Recognized as a separate kingdom Retained as a distinct kingdom
Bacteria Classification Included under Plantae Included under Protista Separated into Monera
Drawbacks – Did not account for microorganisms

Summary:

  1. Two-Kingdom System: Simple but outdated, grouped all living organisms as either plants or animals.
  2. Three-Kingdom System: Recognized Protista but still did not differentiate fungi and prokaryotes properly.
  3. Five-Kingdom System: More accurate, classifying organisms based on their cell type, structure, and mode of nutrition.